Hot Take: How Far is Too Far? Should This New Rangefinder Should Be Banned

In the quest for the perfect rangefinder, I recently stumbled upon a video by Steven Drake on Instagram showcasing a new piece of technology that’s creating quite a stir. As someone who’s spent countless hours in the field, this rangefinder caught my eye for its impressive capabilities. It seemed like the ultimate tool for efficiently tracking down big game animals in the western states. But after some reflection, I’ve come to believe that this particular piece of technology might be crossing the line and it might be time to consider banning it from use.

The Allure of Advanced Technology

The rangefinder in question boasts a particular feature that would have been incredibly useful on past hunting trips. I vividly recall an elk hunt from last year where we struggled to accurately gauge the location of a bugling bull across a drainage. We spent precious minutes analyzing topographical and aerial maps on OnX, only to find ourselves frustratingly lost and far off the mark an hour or so later. In situations like this, the new Leupold RX-5000 TBR-W rangefinder could have provided much-needed precision, potentially changing the outcome of our hunt.

Where Technology Meets Tradition

Here’s where things get complicated. The advent of this rangefinder represents a significant leap in technology, one that seems to blur the lines between traditional hunting skills and high-tech convenience. My initial excitement was tempered by a growing concern that we might be venturing into territory that undermines the very essence of hunting.

In my view, part of the allure of hunting is the challenge of outsmarting nature and reading the land. The failures are just as memorable as the successes and should serve as lessons in the field.

The story of last year's hunt illustrates that this challenge is a crucial component of the experience. The bull we pursued had an intimate knowledge of the terrain, giving him an advantage we lacked. This dynamic—where the hunter's skill is pitted against the animal’s natural advantages—is integral to fair chase.

The Ethical Dilemma

This rangefinder’s ability to essentially “google map” your way to an animal seems to me like it crosses a line. It’s one thing to use technology to enhance your understanding of the environment; it’s another to rely on it to the point where the hunt becomes a mere exercise in following directions rather than a test of skill and strategy.

As technology advances, it’s easy to become enamored with the potential for increased efficiency and accuracy. However, we must ask ourselves where to draw the line. Are we prepared to sacrifice the core values of hunting—skills, strategy, and the satisfaction of overcoming challenges—for the sake of convenience?

The Future of Technology in Hunting

It’s clear that we are only scratching the surface of what technology can offer. From advanced rangefinders to AI-driven tracking systems, the future promises even more sophisticated tools. While these innovations have their place, they also pose a risk of eroding the traditional skills that define hunting. If we’re not careful, we may end up with a sport that bears little resemblance to its roots.

Should This Rangefinder Be Banned?

Given the concerns about technology overshadowing traditional skills, it might be worth considering whether this rangefinder—and others like it—should be restricted or banned. Such measures could help preserve the essence of hunting, ensuring it remains a pursuit defined by skill and respect for hunting rather than technological prowess.

In conclusion, while technology can undoubtedly enhance our experiences, we must tread carefully to avoid compromising the integrity of our pursuits.

What do you think? Should we set boundaries for the use of advanced technologies in hunting to preserve the sport? Share your thoughts and let’s discuss where we should draw the line.